THIMMIREDDY PENCHALAIAH v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/32828/2022 · 2025-11-18
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48411 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48411 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010519422022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 32828/2022 Between:
1. THIMMIREDDY PENCHALAIAH, S/O. POLAIAH, AGE 68 YEARS, R/O. NELIMITTA KANDRIGA VILLAGE, T.P. GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. THAMMIREDDY RAVAMMA, W/O. PENCHALAIAH, AGE. 62 YEARS, R/O. NELIMITTA KANDRIGA VILLAGE, T.P. GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETORY, HOME DEPARTMENTS, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT,
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, T.P. GUDURU POLICE STATION, T.P. GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. KAVALIREDDY SRIDHAR REDDY, S/O. HARNATHREDDY, AGE. 45 YEARS, R/O. KOTHA KODURU VILLAGE, T.P. GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. G. JAGADEESWAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. C SUBODH The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
2
“.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.3, in interfering in a civil dispute and threatening the petitioners to handover the land an extent of Ac.7.73 cents in Sy.No.2-39, of Koduru Kandriga Village, T.P. Guduru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, to the 4th respondent and giving threats through the son of the petitioners, though there is no any direction to handover the said land to the 4th respondent, while pending the appeal in A.S. No. 97/2022, on the file of the court of the VIII Addl. District Judge, Nellore, against the decree and Judgement in O.S. No. 630/2012, on the file of the court of the 1st Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, is as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice, consequently directing the Respondents not to interfere in civil dispute.”
2. Sri G.Jagadeeswar, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Police are interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioners and the unofficial Respondent. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, in view of the interim order dated 10.10.2022 in I.A.No.1 of 2022 the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:19.11.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.24804 of 2022
Dt.17.11.2025
Dinesh