IN TH 216 Puran Cha Sh. KAP others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B Chand vs. disposed of COCP-3161-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.3161 o Date of decision n Chand Bissarwal Versus KAP Sinha, IAS, Chief Secretary AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 05.12.2023 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-16 d vs. State of Punjab and others”, wh d of with the following observations “xxx xxx xxx 12. In the aforesaid petitioner the actual ben not made out, howeve fixation from the year passed, his pay fixation and notional increment the year 2000 upto the will be given actual p District Development a 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 3161 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-18.03.2026 …..Petitioner etary to Govt. of Punjab and …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA i, AAG Punjab. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 16101-2012 titled as “Puran , whereby the writ petition was vations :- said circumstances, giving the l benefits from the year 2000 is wever, order of notional pay ear 2000 having been already tion would be done accordingly ents will be given to him w.e.f. o the year 2011 whereafter he al pay fixation on the post of nt and Panchayat Officer. The VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 15.31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document this Court affidavit of and Pancha of pay fixat upto the ye order dated present pet made by le to be passe disposed o March 18 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-3161-2025 (O & M) petitioner would also b to the post of Deputy be entitled to all conseq allowances including h pension. 13. The exercise s concluded within three xxx xxx xxx” Learned counsel for the State Court to the Compliance Report dated avit of Shri Uma Shankar Gupta, Di Panchayat, Punjab, wherein, it is ment y fixation and notional increments wit the year 2011 have already been gra r dated 30.7.2025 (Annexure R-1); thu nt petition. Today none appears on behalf Heard. In view of the above noted by learned counsel for the State, no passed in the present contempt petiti osed of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 8, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 so be entitled to actual benefits ty Director and he would also nsequential benefits of pay and ng higher retiral benefits and e shall be conducted and ree months henceforth. State has drawn the attention of t dated 26.8.2025 filed by way of ta, Director, Rural Development s mentioned that the said benefits nts with effect from the year 2000 en granted to the petitioner vide 1); thus, no cause survives in the behalf of petitioner. noted facts and the submissions te, no further orders are required t petition and the same is hereby if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 15.31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document