STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, FOREST AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, MUMBAI AND OTHERS v. SMT. VIMAL W/O SHAMRAO TEKAM
WP/2724/2021 · 2025-09-30
Shri Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48404 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48404 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
53. WP 2724.21.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2724 OF 2021 State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Smt. Vimal w/o. Shamrao Tekam WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4199 OF 2021 State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Smt. Leelabai Gopichand Koche WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2828 OF 2021 State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Gopichand Balu Koche WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2325 OF 2021 State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Kisana Karan Kasare Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. S. B. Bissa, AGP for appellant/State. Mr. I. N. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 30.09.2025. . The learned Advocate for the sole respondent contends that the controversy in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 13.08.2020, passed in Writ Petition No.1953 of 2020 (State of Maharashtra...Vs...Meerabai Tekam), as also the
judgment dated 07.10.2021, passed in Writ Petition No. 3932 of 2021 (State of Maharashtra...Vs...Vimal Badole).
2. Mr. Bissa, learned AGP for the appellant/State, does not dispute the contention.
3. In view of the above, the Writ Petitions stand dismissed.
(ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) Tanmay... 2025:BHC-NAG:10040