APHC010079352025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 460/2025 Between: 1. VALLURU SIDDAIAH, S/O. PEDDA SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT 2. VALLURU RASOOL BHI,, W/O. CHINA SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT 3. PIDUGU SUBBA REDDY,, S/O. KONDA REDDY. AGED ABOUT 72. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT 4. BANDI LAKSHMI DEVI,, W/O. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT 5. BATTALA SRINIVASULU,, S/O. PEDA VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT 6. AREM SUBBA NARASAREDDY,, S/O. GANGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 7. SHAIK CHANDINI BHASHA, S/O. KHASIM BHASHA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 8. BATTHALA VENKATAMMA,, W/O. VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. 9. BATTHALA SRINIVASULU,, S/O. PEDAVENKATESU, AGED ABOUT 2 55 YEARS. 10. RENDLA RAMI REDDY,, S/O. PAPI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS. 11. GOONA CHINNA SIDDA REDDY,, S/O. YELLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 12. DUNNATHALA NARASIMHA REDDY,, S/O. PENCHAL REDDY. AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 13. CHINTAMREDDY SUBBA REDDY,, S/O. NAGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 14. PATLURI VENKATA SUBBA REDDY,, S/O. GANGIREDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 15. PAATURU VIJAYAMMA,, W/O.VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 16. VALLURU PHIRAIH, S/O. SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 17. VALLURU TIRUPALU,, S/O. SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS. 18. AREM SUBBALAKHAMMA,, W/O. PENCHAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 19. MALINENIPATNAM GANGAMMA, W/O. ROSAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. 20. AREM SUBBA NARASA REDDY,, S/O. GANGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 21. MALINENIPATNAM LAKSHMAMMA,, W/O. VEKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 22. RAJUPALEM SUBBAMNMA,, W/O. GOPALAYYA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. 23. PATNAM SULOCHANA,, W/O. VENKATA SUBBAYYA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS. 24. AREM NARSIMHA REDDY,, S/O PITCHI REDDY,AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 25. AREM BUJJI,, W/O. LAKSHMI NARASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 3 26. MALE ADI LAKSHMAMMA,, W/O. CHINNAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 27. KOTTURU LAKSHMI NARASAMMA,, W/O. RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 28. NANDHIYALA SUBBAMMA,, W/O. RAMAIAH , AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 29. SHAIK RAMIJA,, W/O. MASTANSABHI, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 30. DUNNATULA RAJA REDDY,, S/O. PENCHAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. 31. .PIDUGU CHINNAPA REDDY,, S/O. KONDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 32. NATAKALA SURESH,, S/O.SUBBA RAYUDU , AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. 33. NELATOORI PIRAIAH,, S/O. PEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 34. PIDUGU TELLAIHAGARI PADMA, W/O.KONDA REDDY. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. . 35. DERANGULA VENKATA SUBBAMMA, W/O.VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 36. VALLURI FATHIMABHI, W/O. REDDY , AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 37. MALINENIPATNAM ROSAIAH, S/O. ROSAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 38. NAGAM RAMA SUBBAREDDY, S/O. SUBBAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 39. SINGANA SIDDAMMNA, W/O. SIVA REDDY , AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 40. PATURU GANGIREDDY, S/O. GANGI REDDY , AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 41. PATURI NARASIMHA REDDY,, S/O. KONADA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 42. NAGAM MANJULA,, W/O. CHINNAYELLAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 4 43. SHAIK CHANDAANI BHASHA,, S/O. KHASIM BHASHA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 44. DUNNATULA YELLA REDDY,, S/O. D.M YELLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 45. DUNNATULA PRAMILA,, D/O.D.M YELLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. 46. KONDURU LAKSHMI KANTHAMMA,, W/O. SHESHA GIRL RAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. ALL ARE R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. G SRINIVASULU IAS, THE SPECIAL COLLECTOR, GALERU NAGARI SRUJALA SRAVANTI PROJECT NEW COLLECTORATE,KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. SRI A VENKATESU, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION,UNIT-LL,TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, NEW COLLECTORATE,KADAPA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for willful, wanton, disobedience of the orders of this Honble High Court dated 05.03.2024 passed in W.P.No.5720 of 2024 by the Honble Lordships, and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit to implead the proposed Respondent as Respondent No.3 in Contempt Case C.C.No. 460 of 2025, and also pending miscellaneous petitions therein on the file of this Hon'ble High Court, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 5 1. VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. A JAYANTHI The Court made the following: 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.460 of 2025 ORDER: This Court, vide order dated 05.03.2024, disposed of the W.P.No.5720 of 2024, directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 therein to examine the representation dated 09.09.2022 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, and communicate the same to the petitioners, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. For non-compliance of the said order, present contempt case has been filed. 2. Precisely, representation is submitted for payment of Solatium on the enhanced compensation and interest amount on the Additional Market Value. 3 The 2nd respondent-Special Deputy Collector (LA) (FAC), TGP Unit-II, Kadapa, vide proceedings dated 01.03.2025, disposed of the representation by relying on orders passed in W.P.Nos.23443 and 23447 of 2010, and suggested the petitioners to file Execution Petition before the competent civil Court. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners requested that a similar order be passed as in C.C.No.451 of 2025, wherein the learned Single Judge of this Court, while closing the contempt case, granted liberty to the petitioners therein to file an Execution Petition before the competent civil Court. 5. The Hon’ble Apex Court in R.N.Dey and others v. Bhagyabati Pramanik and others 1 held that proper forum to execute the award is competent civil Court. 1 (2000) 4 SCC 400 7 6. Therefore, the present Contempt Case is closed granting liberty to petitioners to approach competent Civil Court for execution of the award. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.12.2025 KBN 8 117 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.460 of 2025 02.12.2025 KKBBNN