Dr. Prasant Kumar v. Shri Vibhu Nayar, Secretary, and anr
Cont.Cas(C)/9/2025 · 2025-02-27
T Amarnath Goud
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 484 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 484 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA _A_G_A_R_T_A_L_A_
Cont. Cas(C) No.09 of 2025 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. Chakraborty, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Majumder, Deputy SGI. Mr. M. Debbarma, Addl. G.A.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
_F_I_N_A_L_O_ R_ D_ E_ R_ 27.02.2025
Heard.
When the case is called, both sides are present. Mr. M. Debbarma, learned Addl. G.A. appearing for the respondent-State has submitted that the order of the Court has been complied with and nothing survives for adjudication. The learned counsel for the petitioner did not dispute the same however, sought liberty in the event, if the petitioner is further aggrieved, he can avail remedies.
In view of the above submission made, the present CC stands closed. It is made clear that, if the petitioner is not satisfied with the same, it is always open for him to avail remedies in accordance with law.
T. AMARNATH GOUD, J
A. Ghosh ANJAN GHOSH Digitally signed by ANJAN GHOSH Date: 2025.03.06 17:13:18 +05'30'