Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48395 (RAJ)

DEEPAK YADAV S/O OMPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14331/2025 · 2025-11-10

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45104] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14062/2025 Sachin Singh S/o Shri Ratan Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Narwas, P.s. Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.). (Accused At Present Confined In Jail Khairthal-Tijara) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14331/2025 Deepak Yadav S/o Omprakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Luhadra, Police Station Tijara, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarh Bas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma Mr. Bharat Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 10/11/2025 1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused- applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 49/2025 registered at Police Station Kotkasim District Khairthal Tijara for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submit that applicants are young men aged 22 and 29 years. It is further [2025:RJ-JP:45104] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14062/2025] submitted that FIR was lodged with a delay of 7 months. Furthermore, it is submitted that applicants are in custody from a period of two months. Learned counsel have submitted that allegations are leveled against Devender and not qua the present applicants. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that accused-applicants are young men of 22 and 29 years; that FIR was lodged with a delay of seven months; that applicants are in custody from a period of two months; and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail applications of the accused-applicants and enlarge them on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants 1. Sachin Singh S/o Shri Ratan Singh and 2. Deepak Yadav S/o Omprakash shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- along with bank guarantee of Rs. 5,00,000/-, before the trial Court concerned, till the pendency of the trial; the said bank guarantee may be renewed from time to time, if same lapses, for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/349-350