MANISH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/3982/2025 · 2025-04-28
Rajesh Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48394 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48394 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-3982 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
111
Manish Kumar and another State of Haryana
Coram :
Present:
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral)
1.
the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 to 8 and their relatives.
2.
are major and have marr apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 8. Their marriage certificate as well as photographs evidencing their marriage are on record as Annexures P and Annexure P 21.04.2025 (Annexure P
3.
4.
respondent-State.
5.
value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a 3982-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Manish Kumar and another
Versus Haryana and others
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Puneet Pali, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to the official respondents for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 to 8 and their relatives.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 to 8. They apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 8. Their marriage certificate as well as photographs evidencing their marriage are on record as Annexures P and Annexure P-5. The petitioners have submitted a .04.2025 (Annexure P-6) to respondent no.2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana State. Without entering upon an exercise to value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-3982-2025
Decided on:28.04.2025
...Petitioners
...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners ied against the wishes of respondent nos.4 to 8. They apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 8. Their marriage certificate as well as photographs evidencing their marriage are on record as Annexures P . The petitioners have submitted a representation dated ) to respondent no.2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a
...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners ied against the wishes of respondent nos.4 to 8. They apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 8. Their marriage certificate as well as photographs evidencing their marriage are on record as Annexures P-4 representation dated , accepts notice on behalf of the evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a VINOD KUMAR 2025.04.29 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-3982 direction to respondent no. decide the representation (Annexure P protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived.
6.
the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be underst whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners.
April 28, 2025 vinod*
3982-2025
direction to respondent no.2- Superintendent of Police, District decide the representation (Annexure P-6) of the petitioners and grant them otection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. , 2025
Whether Speaking/Reasoned:
Whether Reportable:
- 2 - Superintendent of Police, District Panchkula ) of the petitioners and grant them otection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by ood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. (Rajesh Bhardwaj)
Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES
NO/YES
Panchkula to ) of the petitioners and grant them It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by ood having expressed any opinion
VINOD KUMAR 2025.04.29 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document