[2025:RJ-JP:49187] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6523/2025 1. Ramjanm @ Lala Meena Son Of Shri Raghunath Meena, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Lokesh Nagar Bilkhon, Sapotara, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 2. Jitendra Meena @ Jeetu Son Of Shri Rassilal Meena, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Lokesh Nagar, Beelkho, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli ( Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Khiladi Son Of Kajodiya Jogi, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Rang Mahal, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Fateh Ram Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vivek Choudhar, PP Mr.Utkarsh Goyal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/12/2025 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for quashing the impugned F.I.R. No.262/2025 registered at Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli for offence under Sections 305(a) & 331(4) BNS, 2023 on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after filing of the instant criminal misc. petition, a charge-sheet has been submitted against the accused-petitioners for the above stated offences before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Sapotara, District [2025:RJ-JP:49187] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6523/2025] Karauli, where the complainant has submitted an application on 25.11.2025 for quashing the proceedings against the petitioners in terms of the compromise and the complainant-respondent has filed a compromise in favour of the petitioners and now, the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant denied the dispute and he submits that the complainant has no objection in case, the proceedings of the impugned F.I.R. is quashed in favour of the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and in the case of The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688. Learned counsel submits that under these circumstances, the proceedings pending against the petitioners may be quashed. 5. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. 6. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter as well as looking to the fact that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and now, the complainant does not wish to prosecute the petitioners and applying the principles as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to invoke the inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS. 7. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands allowed. The proceedings arising out of the impugned F.I.R. [2025:RJ-JP:49187] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6523/2025] No.262/2025 registered at Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli against the petitioners stand quashed and set-aside. 8. The stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 9. The report furnished by the Investigating Officer is ordered to be retained on record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /30