Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4839 (AP)

Mr.Maddala Pitcheswara Rao, v. The Authorized Officer,

WP/1946/2025 · 2025-01-28

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010038462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 1946 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-10 [3483] Mr.Maddala Pitcheswara Rao and others ...Petitioners Vs. The Authorized Officer and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioners: Mr. A. Ravindra Babu appearing vice Mr. S. Murali Mohan Advocate for Respondents: - CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 28th January, 2025. P C : Considering the fact that the petitioners have an equally efficacious alternate remedy before the D.R.T. and considering the ratio of the judgment rendered in the case of PHR Invent Educational Society v. UCO Bank1, we do not find it a fit case to exercise our writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ. RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J. SSN 1 2024 SCC Online SC 528