Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48388 (CHH)

SMT. DULARI KHARE v. SHRI PARDESHI SIDDHARTH KOMAL

CONT/1461/2025 · 2025-12-07

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:59406 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1461 of 2025 1. Smt. Dulari Khare W/o Dhaneshwaranand Prasad Khare Aged About 45 Years Posted And Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Raipura, Block - Dondi Lohara, Distt. - Balod Chhattisgarh 2. Smt. Lata Barley W/o Late Prithvipal Barley Aged About 49 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Nargi, Block - Dondi Lohara, Distt. - Balod Chhattisgarh 3. Mohammad Nisar S/o Mohammad Yaseen Khan Aged About 43 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Raipura, Block - Dondi Lohara, Distt. - Balod Chhattisgarh 4. S. Kala W/o Siji K.T. Aged About 50 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Swami Atmanand Government Excellence English Medium Higher Secondary School Titurdih, Block - Durg, Distt. - Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Shri Pardeshi Siddharth Komal Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Mrs. Niharika Barik, Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Miss Divya Umesh Mishra, Director, Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.12.09 10:56:17 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankush Soni, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 08/12/2025 1. Counsel for the respondents would submit that the order has already been complied with nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant contempt petition. 2. Since the order has already been complied with, as such nothings remains to be adjudicated in the instant case, therefore, the contempt petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to revive the same, if any grievances still survives. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge santosh