Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48383 (AP)

SHAIK MABI ALIAS MULLA MAHABI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/28089/2024 · 2025-05-04

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY. THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 28089 OF 2024 Between: Shaik Mabi Alias Mulla Mahabi, W/o Late Mulla Syed Meer, Aged about 39 years, Occ Unemployeed, R/o D.No. 8-5-60, Saddam Street, Allagada Town, Nandyal District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department. Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Nandyal, Nandyal District. . 3. The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Near Chandra Takies, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 4. The Deputy Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, M.V. Nagar, Allagadda, Nandyal District. 5. The Mandal Tahsildar, Allagadda, Nandyal District. 6. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 7. The Village Revenue Officer, Grama-Ward Sachivalayam. Saddam Colony, Allagadda Town, Nandyal District. 8. Mulla Noorjahan Bee, W/o Mahammad Asham Aged about 45 R/o H.No. 8-7-170, Saddam Colony, Allagadda Town and Mandal Nandyal District. years, 9. Shaik Noorun Bee, W/o. Gouse, Aged about 41 years, R/o H.No. 8-7- 170, Saddam Colony, Allagadda Town and Mandal, Nandyal District. Pathan Gousiya Begum, w/o Basheer, Aged about 39 years, R/o Gayathri Estages, Beside Bilal Mosque Kurnool Town, Kurnool District Mulla Abdul Rehaman, S/o Late Zainalabuddin, Aged about 37 years, R/o H.No. 8-7-170, Saddam Colony, Allagadda Town and Mandal, Nandyal District. Mulla Habiboon, W/o. Dedekula Mahammad Ashraf, Aged about 32 years, R/o. Kranthi Nagar, Nandyal Town, Nandyal District. / IQ.. W- > ■ 11. 12. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings Respondent passed in Letter No. AB/EC-ll/File NO/840M Dated more particularly one in the of the 3rd 14-11-2024 rejecting the plea of the petitioner to appoint her on compassionate grounds in the place of her deceased mother in law named one late Mulla Taharunbi as Sweeper-cum-Attender as unjust, illegal and arbitrary and violative of Principles of Natural Justice apart from violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of consequently to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner, in any suitable post, on compassionate grounds. the Constitution of India and lA NO: 1 OF 2074 Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the officials Respondents not to consider the requests of any other family members of the late Mulla Taharunbi i to 12 If they approach seeking compassionate appointment in the place of the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ Petition. i.e respondents no. 8 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AYESHA AZMA S Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 7: GP FOR SERVICES III & GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 8 to 12: SRI G VENKATA KRISHNAIAH The Court made the following order: APHC010538982024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] / MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE I \ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 28089/2024 Between: Shaik Mabi Alias Mulla Mahabi ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.AYESHAAZMAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES III 2.GP FOR SERVICES I 3.G VENKATA KRISHNAIAH The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 2 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 5 I OFFICER S To, 1. One CC to Sri Ayesha Azma S Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri G Venkata Krishnaiah Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Services III, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. Two CCs to GP for Services I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies:; - #'• GSC>(gsg>:^, if t* t ' HIGH COURT DATED:05/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.28089 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS