% IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATJ (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE v/ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDa'^ WRIT PETITION NO: 11211 OF 2025 ^ V. >9 w Between: K Subbamma, W/o Late K.Veeraiah, Aged about Ulavaalh, Chejerla Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 65 years, R/o ...Petitioner AND DeL^rtmen? H ^’’incipal Secretary, Re^nue Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. The District Collector, SPSR Nellore District, 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, SPSR Nellore District. 4. The Tahsildar, Chejerla mandal SPSR Nellore District. Pncf '^/o G Masthanaiah, Aged about 65 Post, Chejerla Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. years, Ulavapalli ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue , which is in the nature of praying that in may an appropriate Writ, order or direction mostly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in taking jteps for dispossession of the Petitioner respect to land in S.No.60-1 admeasuring Ac.O.^i Village, Chejarla Mandal, SPSR Nellore District before period in L.Dis.No. 720/85 dated 12-05-^85 one with cents in Thimayapalem the expiry of lease of the 4th Respondent 19 and 300A of the Constitution of consequently direct the Respondents to not to dispossess the Petitioners and not to interfere with the subject land without as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified. Articles 14, India, unreasonable and / ^ following due process of law till completion of lease > ■'2-05-1985 of the 4"’ Respondent. IA NO: 1 OF period in in L.Dis.No. ^ Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents praying that in the circumstances not to dispossess the petitioner with respect to land in S.No.60-1 admeasuring Ac.0.71 Village, Chejarla Mandal, SPSR Nellore cents in Thimayapalem District till completion of lease period, V Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s SODUM ANVESHA ^ Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: // APHC010226662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11211/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER K Subbamma AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SODUM ANVESHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11211/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in taking steps for dispossession of the petitioner with respect to land in S. No. 60-1 admeasuring Ac.0.71 cents in Thimayapalem Village, Chejarla Mandal, SPSR Nellore District before the expiry of lease period in L.Dis.No. 720/85 dated 12.05.1985 of the 4^ respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified, Articles 14, 19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, unreasonable and conseguently direct the respondents to not to dispossess the petitioner and not to interfere with the subject land without following due process of law till completion of lease period in L.Dis.No. 720/85 dated 12.05.1985 of the 4^ respondent and pass such other order. ” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. th 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 4 respondent granted lease in respect of the government poramboke land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0.71 cents in Sy.No.60-1, Thimayapalem Village, Chejarla Mandal, SPSR Nellore District in favour of the petitioner for a period of fifty years vide L.Dis.No.720/8 dated 12.05.1985. After the death of the petitioner’s husband, the petitioner has been in possession and enjoyment of the subject 3 lease hold property. The lease period is in force till 12.05.2035. \ While the lease period is in subsistence, the respondents are trying \ to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that, if the lease period of the petitioner is still in force and if she entitled any right being legal heir after the death of original lease holder, the respondents would follow due process of law. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents and on perusal of the material placed on record, without going into the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition directing the respondents not to interfere and not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property without determining the rights of the petitioner being legal heir of the original lease holder, without following due process of law. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. Sd/- M. PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. The District Collector, SPSR Nellore District.v/ 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, SPSR N^^lore District. 4. The Tahsildar, Chejerla Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 5. One CC to M/s Sodum Anvesha, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies J RAM HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.11211 of 2025 ^rOFANO^ t 2 » MAr 2025 aieciion . DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS