Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48379 (RAJ)

FARUKH NAGAURI AND ORS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR

CRLMP/4291/2015 · 2025-10-27

Anand Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42900] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.4291/2015 1. Farukh Nagauri S/o Shri Idu Khan, 2. Babu S/o Shri Kana Ram, 3. Suja Ram S/o Shri Kana Ram, 4. Ishwar Lal S/o Shri Kana Ram, All R/o Aman Vihar, behind Sannu ka Dhaba, Jagatpura Road, Khonagoriyan, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor. 2. Munna Khan S/o Late Shri Lal Khan, R/o House No.66, Amagarh, Shakti Colony, Delhi Bye Pass, Jaipur(Rajasthan). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.6382/2015 1. Munir Khan S/o Late Shri Khaju Khan, R/o Aman Vihar, Behind Sanny ka Dhaba, Jagatpura Road, Khonagoriyan, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. Abdul Sayeed S/o Late Shri Gafoor, aged about 55 years, R/o Near Adarsh Nagar Shamshan, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor. 2. Munna Khan S/o Latte Shri Lal Khan, R/o House No.661, Amargarh, Shakti Colony, Delhi Bye Pass, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 27/10/2025 1. In the present criminal miscellaneous petitions, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the FIR No.64/2015 registered with Police Station-Kho Nagoriyan, District-Jaipur (East) [2025:RJ-JP:42900] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4291/2015] for alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 447, 448 & 120B of IPC. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor produced one factual report dated 27.01.2020, which is taken on record. 3. As per factual report, negative final report has been filed. 4. In view of the above statement, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the present criminal miscellaneous petitions. 5. Accordingly, the present criminal miscellaneous petitions are dismissed as not pressed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/20-21