Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48369 (AP)

NUTAKKI PRASAD v. KANDEPI USHA RANI

CRP/1264/2020 · 2025-02-20

Nyapathy Vijay

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 12fi4 OF 2020 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the order dated 22.10.2020 in lA No.224 of 2020 in O.S. No. 43 of 2013 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Eluru. Between: Nutakki Prasad, S/o.late Seshaiah, Hindu, male, aged 56 yrs, r/o.D.No.2-146, Vidya Nagar Colony, Satrampadu, Buru-534007. West Godavari District. ...PETITIONER IF AND Smt. Kandepi Usha Rani, W/o.Naga6hushanam, Hindu, female, aged 51 House-wife, r/o.D.No.2-43, Lingagudem, Yandapalli Post, Chintalapudi Mandalam. W.G.Dt., yrs. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MANCHANAPALLI SURYANARAYANA pounsel for the Respondents: SRI N SRIHARI The Court made the following: ORDER ^ . APHCQ10348812020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1264/2020 Between: ...PETITIONER Nutakki Prasad AND ...RESPONDENT Kandepi Usha Rani Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MANCHANAPALLI SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent: 1.N SRIHARl The Court made the following: 2 i ii THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Si CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1264 of 2020 ORDER: The present Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the Order, dated 22.10.2020, passed in I.A.No.224 of 2020 in O.S.No.43 of 2013, on the file 1. of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Eluru, West Godavari District. 2. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue in the Revision Petition has been rendered infructuous in view of the subsequent developments. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand 'closed. 3. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ''■'J ^ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Senior Civil Judge- Eluru, W.G. District. 2. One CC to Sri Manchanapalli Suryanarayana, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri N Srihari, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi. ' 5. Three CD Copies at TF ! HIGH COURT DATED:21/02/2025 ORDER CRP.No.1264 of 2020 ^ 0 ^ AUG 2025 o Co' SCigrentSectjgpX^' DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS