Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46778] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 13633/2025 Mohit S/o Jagdish, R/o Budhpura Police Station Dabi District Bundi Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 19/11/2025
1. Instant second bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Mohit S/o Jagdish, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.98/2025 dated 07.06.2025 registered at P.S. Dabi District - Bundi , for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 190 of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the parties have entered into compromise and same is also filed before the trial court. He submits that injured Jeetendra has been
[2025:RJ-JP:46778] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13633/2025] examined as PW-2 and he has turned hostile and not supported the case of prosecution. The report was registered by PW-1 mother of injured and she also turned hostile and not supported the case of prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is in custody for last six months and disposal of case will take its own time. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. First bail application of petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn on 13.08.2025 whereas this Court has already allowed bail application of Roshan, Sumit @ Anta, Abhishek and Shairu. The documents submitted by learned counsel for petitioner indicate that Kalavati who is mother of injured has turned hostile and not supported the case of prosecution while recording her statement before the trial court as PW-1. The injured Jeetendra was also examined as PW-2 and he has also turned hostile and not supported the case of prosecution. Even third witness Akash has also turned hostile and not supported the case of prosecution. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case
[2025:RJ-JP:46778] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13633/2025] and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Mohit S/o Jagdish, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.
(iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /8