Sl.No. 126 Court No. 35 G.S.Das 30.01.2025 WPA 29261 of 2024 Ajit Kumar Modak -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Anil Kumar Chattopdhyay … for the petitioner(s) Ms. Jhuma Chakraborty, ld. Sr. Govt. Adv. Ms. Munmun Tewary … for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Ujjal Ray … for the respondent no. 6 Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. So far as the boundary line is concerned, if there is no dispute but the petitioner is restrained from carrying out his work, the police authorities would ensure that there is no breach of the peace and tranquility at the locale. However, if there is any dispute in respect of the boundary line, the parties would settle the dispute before the 2 learned Civil Court, then only, the police authorities would interfere for rendering their appropriate assistance. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 29261 of 2024 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)