Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
`
CWP-11016-2025
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 125
CWP-11016-2025 Date of Decision: 24.04.2025 Vikas Kadian
…Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Sandeep, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Raman Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Haryana ***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent No.3-Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission (for short ‘Commission’) to consider his claim for higher pay scale and decide his representation-cum-legal notice dated 30.01.2025 (Annexure P-1)
2.
The petitioner claims that he served Commission from 03.11.2014 to 18.12.2018. He belongs to Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam. As per Haryana Civil Services (General) Rules, 2016 and Haryana Civil Services (Pay) Rules, 2016, the petitioner, while on deputation, was entitled to pay scale as payable to employees of Commission.
3.
Mr. Raman Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Haryana who on advance notice is present in Court, assures the Court that competent MOHIT KUMAR 2025.04.24 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgement.
`
CWP-11016-2025
-2- authority would consider petitioner’s representation-cum-legal notice dated 30.01.2025 and address the same within two months from today.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement.
5.
In the wake of statement of learned counsel for both sides, the present petition stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 24.04.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MOHIT KUMAR 2025.04.24 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgement.