Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48362 (AP)

GANTA VENKATESWARULU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/33438/2025 · 2025-12-14

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010630782025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33438/2025 Between: 1. GANTA VENKATESWARULU, S/O GANTA RAMAIAH HINDU, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS. DN0 76-15-6, FLAT NO.103,P.S TOWERS, KRISHNA BLOCKS, NEAR DARGA, BHAVANIPURAM. N.T.R DISTRICT, 520012, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. GANTA DAMAYANTI, W/O GANTA VENKATESWARULU HINDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, D NO 76-15-6, FLAT NO. 103, P.STOWERS.KRISHNA BLOCKS. NEAR DARGA. BHAVANIPURAM. N.T.R DISTRICT, 520012, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, LALAPET POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR, LALAPET POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. GANTA SURYA KUMARI, W/O GANTA GANESH, D/O M. PEDA ESHWARUDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, D.NO 6-226, MAIN ROAD, PRATTIPADU POST.0PP. RICEMILL, EAST GODAVARI DIST., 533432 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BHASKAR PREM KOUSHIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent police from Intimidating summoning, calling, or harassing the petitioners in relation to private matrimonial/property disputes as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional etc and consequently direct the respondent police not to interfere mediators in such civil disputes pending before competent courts and or act” 2. Sri Bhaskar Prem Koushik, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint made by the daughter in law of the petitioner, the petitioner was called to the police station for family counseling and they have requested time to attend along with their son on the next counseling session but they did not turn up as on this day, no crime has been registered. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.12.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.33438 of 2025 Dt.15.12.2025 Asr