Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48357 (RAJ)

SADDAM S/O HANNI @ HANIF v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13786/2025 · 2025-11-04

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44368] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13786/2025 1. Saddam S/o Hanni @ Hanif, R/o Jaimat (Jawant) Police Station Punhana District Nuh Haryana (At Present Confined In Distt Jail Karauli). 2. Abid S/o Hanni @ Hanif, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Jaimat (Jawant) Police Station Punhana District Nuh Haryana (At Present Confined In Distt Jail Karauli). ----Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Liyakat Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 04/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No.84/2023 registered at Police Station Karauli, District Karauli for the offence(s) under Section 379 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the applicants are the sole bread earners of their families. It is submitted that they are behind the bars ever since 10.08.2025 and trial will take a long time. It is submitted that three criminal antecedents are registered against the applicants. It is further submitted that the applicants are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by the Court. [2025:RJ-JP:44368] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13786/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, the fact that the applicants are sole bread earners of their family; and looking to the custody period and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge them on bail subject to condition that accused- applicants shall contribute to the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan – initiative of the government, for a period of two months from the date of enlarging on bail, for two hours, as an honorary work, under the supervision and directions of the SHO concerned. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants- Saddam S/o Hanni @ Hanif and Abid S/o Hanni @ Hanif shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /277