Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48357 (ALL)

ANJANI KUMAR TRIPATHI AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/5379/2025 · 2025-07-14

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:113829 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5379 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anjani Kumar Tripathi And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishal Tandon Counsel for Respondent :- Arvind Srivastava Iii,C.S.C.,Nand Lal Pandey,Shesh Kumar Srivastava,Suyash Pandey Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following reliefs:- i. To call for the records and issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the order dated 06.03.2025 passed by the Respondent no. 3 i.e. District Inspector of Schools, Prayagraj whereby the said respondent has illegally withheld the salary of the petitioners. ii. To call for the records and issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the entire proceedings of the illegal enquiry initiated by the respondent no. 3 with respect to the appointment of the petitioners in the respondent no. 4 institution. iii. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent no. 3 to forthwith release the salary of the petitioners from the date of their initial joining of service till today. iv. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent no. 3 not to take any action against the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned enquiry proceedings. 2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State / D.I.O.S. has placed written instructions received in the office of Chief Standing Counsel from the D.I.O.S and has submitted that the prayer which has been made by the petitioner in the writ petition is under consideration by the D.I.O.S., Prayagraj for payment of salary. The instruction is taken on record. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has also referred para-7 of page-E of the instructions , which is quoted below:- "यह ककि ययाचचीगण किके वकेतन कवषयकि प्रकिरण मम 20 कदिवस किके भचीतर प्रकक्रियया किको पपूणर किरया कदियया जयाएगया।" 4. It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel that within three weeks the dispute regarding payment of salary of the petitioners is deemed to be resolved and appropriate orders may be passed by the D.I.O.S. if there is no other legal impediments. 5. At this juncture learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the instant writ petition may be disposed of by issuing a direction to the D.I.O.S., Prayagraj that the salary be paid to the petitioners which whom there is no other legal impediments. 6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Saurabh, learned Standing Counsel for the State and also perused the written instructions, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition with the direction to the District Inspector of Schools, Prayagraj to pass a detailed orders within three weeks as undertaken by the learned Standing Counsel on behalf of DIOS for payment of salary to the petitioners, if there is no other legal impediments. 7. In view of the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 S.K.S. (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad