Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38104 MFA No. 663 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.663 OF 2024 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SRICHARAN S/O LATE Y.A. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.8-2457, SETTURU ROAD KALYANADURGAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-515761. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHIVAREDDY K.N., ADVOCATE AND SMT. BUJAMMA A.M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. JAGANNATH S N SON OF LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS
1) (A) NAGAVENI W/O LATE JAGANNATH S.N.
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/O CHANNAKESHAVA FLOOR MILL, SINGANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560 064.
(R-1(A) CAUSE TITLE AMENDED VIDE COURT
ORDER DATED 6.8.2025).
2.
SRI S.J. BRIJESH REDDY SON OF SRI JAGANNATH S N,
Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38104 MFA No. 663 of 2024
AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.E 63, CURRENT NO.20, KATHA NO.227/1 AND 2, OPPOSITE TO CHANNAKESHAVA FLOOR MILL, SINGANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI AND TALUK BENGALURU-560064.
3.
SMT. SAHANA S J WIFE OF SRI PRATHAP, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO.332, MMR HOUSE, MADAPATTNA VILLAGE, MARAMMA TEMPLE ROAD, HARAGADDE POST, BENGALURU-560105.
4.
SMT. JAYAMMA N WIFE OF LATE Y.N. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, NO.E.62 , CURRENT NO.20/1, KATHA NO.227/1 AND 2 OPPOSITE TO CHANNAKESHAVA FLOOR MILL, SINGANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI AND TALUK BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJENDRA S., ADVOCATE FOR R1(A), R2 TO R4;
SMT. ANAGHA N. SHARMA, ADVOCATE FOR LRS OF R1)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09.11.2022 PASSED ON I.A. NOs.
1 TO 3 IN O.S.NO.1678/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE I.A. NOs.I AND II FILED UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC AND ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.III FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38104 MFA No. 663 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT
The appeal is filed by the defendant challenging the
order dated 09.11.2022 passed by the VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru, in O.S.No.1678/2022 on I.A.Nos.I to III filed under Order 39 Rule and 2 of CPC seeking temporary injunction against the defendant.
It is submitted that in the suit the evidence is commenced, therefore if direction is issued to decide the suit within a timeframe that would meet the ends of justice between the parties. Since, the suit is scheduled for evidence, the suit shall be disposed of within nine months from the date of receipt of copy of this order on merits in accordance with law.
With this observation, the appeal stands disposed of.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE
DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29