Sanapathi Sateesh Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/9382/2025 · 2025-09-24
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48352 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48352 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX iPRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA lA No. 1 OF 2026 i V IN CRLP NO: 9382 OF 2025 Between: Sanapathi Sateesh Kumar, S/o. Late Prakasa Rao, aged about 36 years, R/o. Balljhepallivari street, Vijetha Junction FA 4, 1®^ florr^, uday residency, Srikakulam Town and District, Andhra Pradesh. Petitioner/Accused No.1 AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Amaravati. ...Respondent No.l/Complainant
2. Labala Monica, D/o. Sathish, aged about 29 years, Pandi Vajrapukotturu, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh. Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to relax the conditions imposed on the petitioner by deleting the Condition No’s. IV, V, and VI from the order dated 25-09-2025 in Crl.P.No.9382 of2025. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the
order of the High Court dated: 17.09.2025 & 25.09.2025 made herein and upon hearing the
1 /
arguments of Sri. M. SAPTHAGIRI, Advocate for the Petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent No.1, the Court made the following:
ORDER This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner/Accused No.1 seeking to relax the condition Nos. IV, V and VI imposed vide Order, dated 25.09.2025 in Criminal Petition No.9382 of 2025. ti 2) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 3) Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused No.1 and nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner/Accused No.1, the condition No.V i.e., the petitioner/Accused No.1 shall not leave the State of Andhra Pradesh limits without the express permission from the Station House Officer concerned, is hereby relaxed. 4) In respect of condition No.VI, the Investigating Officer is
directed to deposit the passport of the petitioner/Accused No.1 before the concerned Magistrate Court forthwith. 5) Condition No.lV is not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 6) Accordingly, IA.No.1 of 2026 is ordered. \ Sd/-U.SR1DEVI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// F ER To,
//
1. The Station House Officer, Vajrapukotturu Police Station, Srikakulam District.
2. Labala Monica, D/o. Sathish, aged about 29 years Vajrapukotturu, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh. (BY RPAD) Pandi
3. One CC to Sri. M. SAPTHAGIRI, Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to Sri K.ANAND KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CCS to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. [OUT].
6. One spare copy
HIGH COURT DR.VJP,J DATED:17/02/2026
ORDER lA No. 1 OF 2026 IN CRLP NO: 9382 OF 2025 IA.N0.1 OF 2026 IS ORDERED