Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48345 (RAJ)

IKRAM KHAN S/O CHAND KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12919/2025 · 2025-10-16

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42428] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12919/2025 Ikram Khan S/o Chand Khan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Opposite Dhanna Talai Kanta, Police Station Kotwali, Tonk, District Tonk (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta-PP Mr. Sudhir Jain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the FIR No. 725/2024 registered at Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East) wherein he has been charged for the offence punishable under Section 110 of BNS, 2023. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a common general omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioner and co-accused persons. Counsel submits that injured-Mohammad Hanif has sustained two grievous injuries on his left knee and left arm and rest of the injuries are found to be simple in nature. Counsel submits that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own [2025:RJ-JP:42428] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12919/2025] time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant oppose the bail application. 4 Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that common general allegations have been levelled against the petitioner and other co- accused persons and also considering the fact that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents and he has been in custody since the date of his arrest and since the trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Ikram Khan S/o Chand Khan arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/266