Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48344 (KAR)

SRI. L. NARENDRA PRASAD v. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

RP/62/2025 · 2025-10-16

K S Hemalekha

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41341 RP No. 62 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REVIEW PETITION NO. 62 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI. L. NARENDRA PRASAD S/O LATE C. V. LAKSHMINARAYAN SHASTRI, AGED 53 YEARS, R/AT NO. 29A, 9TH CROSS, RMV EXTN., SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU- 560 080. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SADASHIVAIAH K G.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 020 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 020 3. THE SECRETARY, THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 020. Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41341 RP No. 62 of 2025 4. SRI. ARUN KALYANI, S/O LATE C. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 5. SRI. VENKATAPPA S/O LATE GUNDLU MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 6. SRI. VENKATESH S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU- 560 064. …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION.114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 20.03.2023 PASSED IN WP NO.15256/2020 AND HEAR THE MATTER AFRESH BY RESTORING THE WRIT PETITION BEARING WP NO.15256/2020 AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41341 RP No. 62 of 2025 ORAL ORDER On 08.09.2025, the following order was passed by this Court: "Ten days time is granted to comply with the office objections. In the event the office objections would not get complied, the petition would be dismissed for its non-prosecution. In the event they stand complied, Registry is directed to list the matter for 'Preliminary Hearing'." 2. Office objections have not yet been complied. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36