IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2952 OF 9ni,? Between: P.R. Krishna, E-097643, Stores Supervisor, S/o. late Ganesh Gokavaram Depot, R/o. Gokavaram, East Godavari District. aged 58 yrs ...PETITIONER AND 1. The APSRTC, rep. By its Managing Director, Musheerabad, 2. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Gokavaram, East Godavari District. Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India , the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue praying that in may an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in imposing the punishment of reduction of basic pay by 2 incremental stages upto the on the allegation of excess/Short items found in the stores, vide Proc. No. M1/377(10)/2012-GKRM date of retirement , Dt. 26-12-2012, as illegal, set aside in the interest of unjust and arbitrary and as such liable to be justice by directing the respondents to treat duty for all purposes and to pay all the terminal benefits the suspension period as on % I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP. NO: 2487 OF 2013) Between: 1. The APSRTC, rep. By its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Gokavaram, East Godavari District. ...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS AND P.R. Krishna, E-097643, Stores Supervisor, S/o. late Ganesh, aged 58 yrs, Gokavaram Depot, R/o. Gokavaram, East Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dismiss the writ petition by vacating the interim order dated 01.02.2013 passed in WP MP No. 3635/2013 in WP No. 2952/2013. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 3635 OF 20131 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to pay all the terminal benefits by suspending the Proc. No. M1/377(10)/2012- GKRM, Dt. 26-12-2012, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K SATYANARAYANA MURTHY (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010259842013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY. THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE S!=fl0 [3330] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2952/2013 Between: P.R.Krishna ...PETITIONER AND The APSRTC and another Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SATYANARAYAN MURTHY(SC FOR APSRTC) ...RESPONDENT(S) 2.- The Court made the following: p 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 2952 of 2013 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. is no Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any. shall stand closed. Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR assistant REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to Sri S M Subhan Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri K Satyanarayan Murthy (SC for APSRTC) Advocate [OPUC] Three CD Copies I. 2. 3. TF HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.2952 of 2013 g( 18 SEP 2025 ] O' ml Co' ^ ^bUrrent SectionX*^ DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS