SHOBHA ARYA D/O SHRI KANA RAM ARYA W/O SHRI GIRIRAJ BHADERVA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16837/2025 · 2025-11-19
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48340 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48340 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46979] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16837/2025 Shobha Arya D/o Shri Kana Ram Arya W/o Shri Giriraj Bhaderva, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 08, Shrinathpura, Heda Hospital Ke Pass, Sendara Road, Beawar. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, En- ergy Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Deputy Secretary, Energy Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Judgment / Order 19/11/2025 1 This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- The respondents may be directed to consider the candidature of the humble petitioner for promotion to the post of Electrical Inspector from the post of Assistant Electrical Inspector against the SC category vacancies which was available in year 2018-2019 and the same may be ordered to be treated as carried forward and accordingly the same may be made avail- able for the petitioner against vacancies of year 2025-2026 before undertaking the exer- cise of the DPC for the post of Electrical In- spector in the interest of justice. During the pendency of the writ petition, if any
[2025:RJ-JP:46979] (2 of 3) [CW-16837/2025] such exercise of the DPC of year 2025-2026 for the post of Electrical Inspector is undertaken, then the same may be directed to be reviewed by way of carrying forward the post of SC Cat- egory as per the roster point which was avail- able in year 2018-2019 against the vacancies of year 2025-2026 in the interest of justice and accordingly, the petitioner may be ordered to be considered against such SC Category which is to be carried forward till the availabil- ity of the SC Category candidate in the interest of justice”. 2 During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Au- thority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3 Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respon- dents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking or- der within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of repre- sentation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner ei- ther by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:46979] (3 of 3) [CW-16837/2025] 4 With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU/132