IN THE 127+202 1. CRM-M- Sahil State of Punjab 2. CRM-M- Rajwant Kaur @ State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. in CRM Ms. in CRM Mr. Mr. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Both No.130 dated Bharatiya Nyaya Police Station Maqboolpura, different accused by a common order. 2. Learned that the only attribution harbouring the THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-66756 CRM-M-10769 Date of decision: -66756-2025 VERSUS -10769-2026 @ Raji VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD . Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the CRM-M-66756-2025. Ms. Rishma Verma, Advocate for the CRM-M-10769-2025. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab Mr. Balbir Singh Sewak, Advocate ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Both these petitions, arising out of 05.12.2024 registered under Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25 Maqboolpura, District Amritsar accused for seeking grant of regular bail, order. Learned counsel appearing on behalf attribution against the petitioners other accused and there are 04 PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 66756-2025(O&M) 10769-2026(O&M) decision: 19.03.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ the petitioner the petitioner Punjab. for the complainant. of the same case bearing FIR Sections 103, 190 of the 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Amritsar having been filed by two bail, are hence being decided behalf of the petitioners contend petitioners in the present case is for 04 other persons who were SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.19 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 127+202 CRM-M-66756-2025(O&M) CRM-M-10769-2026(O&M) attributed similar role. The said four persons are Gurjant Singh @ Gurjant, Navdeep Singh @ Preet, Baljit Singh and Twinkle and that all of the said persons have already been granted concession of regular bail vide separate orders passed in CRM-M-24504-2025 dated 11.09.2025; passed in CRM-M- 51222-2025 & CRM-M-50302-2025 on 29.11.2025 and passed in CRM-M- 59012-2025 on 06.02.2026 respectively. They further contend that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents and that no recovery has been effected from them. 3. Learned State Counsel does not dispute the fact that the case of the petitioners is at par with the other co-accused Gurjant Singh @ Gurjant, Navdeep Singh @ Preet, Baljit Singh and Twinkle. 4. I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties and have gone through the documents appended alongwith the present petitions. 5. In view of the facts noticed above and taking into consideration that co-accused Gurjant Singh @ Gurjant, Navdeep Singh @ Preet, Baljit Singh and Twinkle have already been granted the concession of regular bail vide different orders as mentioned above, thus with a view to extend parity and keeping the case of the present petitioners at par with the other co- accused, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioners on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 6. The instant petitions are allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on regular bail on their furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.19 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3 127+202 CRM-M-66756-2025(O&M) CRM-M-10769-2026(O&M) 7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly. 8. The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material. 9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 19.03.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.19 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document