1 2025:CGHC:52851 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6851 of 2021 1 - Sita Ram Chouhan S/o Late Shri Baba Singh Chouhan Aged About 54 Years R/o Charoda, Municipal Corporation Bhilai, Post And P.S. Charoda, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director, Department Of Urban Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Joint Director Urban Administration Officer Of The Joint Director (Regional), Durg, Post And District Durg Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai Charoda, Post And P.S. Charoda, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Chief Executive Officer, Special Area Development Authority (Sada), Bhilai Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 6 - Hemlal Dewangan, Mail Messenger, Posted At Commissioner Officer, Dispatch Section, Municipal Corporation Bhilai Charoda, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 7 - Lalaram Sahu Mail Messenger, Posted At Commissioner Officer, Accounts Section, Municipal Corporation Bhilai Charoda, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Kusum Lal Chandani on behalf of Mr. A. K. Yadav, Advocate For Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, PL For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Prakash Kumar Goswami, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order On Board HIFZURRAHMAN ANSARI Digitally signed by HIFZURRAHMAN ANSARI Date: 2025.10.30 17:11:36 +0530 2 29.10.2025 1) At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the respondent No. 4 raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition along with the copy of petition and in turn, respondent No. 4 may also be directed to consider and decide the same at the earliest within any specific period as fixed by this Court. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that they are having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3) On the basis of submission made by both the counsel for the parties, at this stage, without entering into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the respondent No. 4 raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition along with the copy of this petition within ‘30 days’ from today and on submission of such representation the respondent No. 4 is directed to consider and decide the same within an outer limit of ‘120 days’ from the submission of such representation in accordance with the relevant rules and law applicable to the case of petitioner.. \ Sd/- Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge H.Ansari