[2025:RJ-JP:4604] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1651/2025 1. Ram Lal Gurjar S/o Gokul Gurjar, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Gujaro Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 10, Jajawar, Tehsil Nainwan, District Bundi, Rajasthan, Presently Working As Resource Person In Kota Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd., Kota. 2. Raghu Raj Gochar Gurjar S/o Devlal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Devnarayan Mandir Marg, Jaloda, District Bundi, Raj, Presently Working As Resource Person In Kota Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd., Kota. 3. Ramswaroop Meena S/o Bhairu Lal Meena, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Mandir Ke Pass, Roopnagar, Post Office Mangal, Tehsil Bundi, District Bundi, Presently Working As Resource Person In Kota Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd., Kota. 4. Naini Ram Gocher S/o Satyanarayan Gurjar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Bhairupura Barad, Tehsil Bundi, District Bundi, Working On The Post Of Resource Person In Kota Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited, Kota. 5. Jagdish Meena S/o Badrilal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Karjuna, Tehsil Bundi, District Bundi, Working On The Post Of Resource Person In Kota Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited, Kota. 6. Gopal Lal S/o Ramkunwar, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Lesarda, Tehsil K. Patan, District Bundi, Working On The Post Of Resource Person In Kota Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited, Kota. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Managing Director, Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federation Limited, Saras Sankul, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Manager, Kota Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited, District Kota. [2025:RJ-JP:4604] (2 of 3) [CW-1651/2025] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendar Neel JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/02/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are working with the respondents on contract basis since last more than nine years. Learned counsel submits that due salary of the petitioners for a particular term has not been released by the respondents for the reasons best known to them. Learned counsel submits that before approaching this Court, the petitioners approached the respondents by way of filing representation and giving notice for demand of justice, but no heed has been paid by them, hence under these circumstances, interference of this Court is warranted. Learned counsel submits that appropriate directions be issued to the authorities concerned to decide the representation within a time frame. Learned counsel submits that the authorities concerned are supposed to decide the representation of the petitioner in light of the judgment passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Versus State of Rajasthan in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 3. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioners and in the light of judgment passed by this [2025:RJ-JP:4604] (3 of 3) [CW-1651/2025] Court in the case of Pawan Meena (supra), the instant writ petition stands disposed of with directions to the respondents to decide the representation (pending, if any) expeditiously as early as possible within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and a speaking order. 4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/24