[2025:RJ-JP:43907] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16636/2025 Madan Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Kishan Lal Gurjar, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Gram Bagri, Post Bassi, Tehsil Todaraisingh, District Tonk, Rajasthan. At Present Posted As Food Safety Officer Under Chief Medical And Health Officer, Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Mohan Rajkumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 01/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with following prayers: “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that the Hon'ble High Court may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and to quash the impugned rejection letter dated 08.09.2025 (Anx.12) and the respondents be directed to allow or participate in the interview for the post of Physical Training Instructor having been declared eligible. Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” [2025:RJ-JP:43907] (2 of 2) [CW-16636/2025] 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /14