Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48328 (AP)

Talatam Satya Babu, v. A.P.S.R.T.C.,

WP/33328/2012 · 2025-02-24

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:.AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. WRIT PETITION NO: 33328 OF 2012 Between: 1. Talatam Satya Babu, S/o. Rarnachandram, Aged about 48 years, Occ : Mechanical Grade - .I, Steel,City Depot, APSRTC, Kurmannapalem, R/o. Sarada Colony, Anakapally, Visakhapatnam. 2. S.Suryanayana Murthy, S/o.Sn Ramulu Aged about 53 years, Oce : Mechanical Grade - I, Gokavaram Depot, APSRTC, Rajahmundry, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. R/o. ...Petitioners AND 1. A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by its VC. & MD, Musheerabad, Hyderabad 2. Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.f.e.; Visakhapatnam. 3. Regional Manager, A.P.S.R:T.x:., Rajahmundry. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more so, a writ in the nature of praying that in may V ■ V i Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the ITI certificates issued by APSRTC, ITI, Lalaguda, Secunderabad for promotion as LH. in our respectiye regions and in promoting the juniors ignoring the III Certificates issued by the 1St respondent herein arbitrary, illegal, capririons, in equitable and offending the fundamental rights and consequentially to direct the respondents to give the promotions to the petitioners as L.H. basing on the ITI certificate issued by APSRTC, ITI, Lalaguda, Secunderabad as per seniority as I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012fWPMP. NO: 42403 OF 2012) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to consider representation for giving promotion to the petitioner as' TH as per seniority based on the ITI Certificate issuing by APSRTC, ITI, lalaguda, Secunderabad, during the pendency of the above writ petition ' Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI G VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondents: K. SARALA REDDY (SC FOR APSRTC,PNV) The Court made the following: Order ■, r-: APHC010388652012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33328/2012 Between: Talatam Satya Babu, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND A P S R T C and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.G VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): I.K. SARALA REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC.PNV) The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT{S) % t THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.33328 OF 2012 ORDER: 1. No representation for the petitioners. 2. This writ petition is filed challenging the inaction on the part of the respondents in not extending the promotion to the petitioners by considering their ITI certificates issued by A.P.S.R.T.C., I.T.I., Lalaguda, Secunderabad. 3. The learned standing counsel for the respondents submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, both the petitioners have attained the age of superannuation and that apart the petitioners were considered for promotion and were accordingly promoted. Recording the same, no further orders are required in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand Sd/”u SRI DEVi assistant r^istrar SECTION OFFICER 4. 5. closed //TRUE copy;; To VASANTHA RAYUDU Advocate [OPUC] SARALA REDDY (SC FOR APSRTC.PNV) Advocate 1. OneCCtoSRlG 2 One CC to SRl K. [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies C5tr.G t 4 HIGH COURT DATED:25/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.33328 of 2012 X 17 JUN 2025 ^ . Curreni becuon Co CLOSED THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS