Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4832 (PNJ)

ANGREJ SINGH v. BHUPINDER KUMAR

CRM-M/23071/2026 · 2026-04-27

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 144 Angrej Singh Bhupinder Kumar CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The order dated 06.12.2025 Judge, Fazilka furnishing of bail/surety bonds of the Trial Court within a period of 60 days 2. After arg with the absence of any material placed before this Court to for opinion otherwise or on the basis whereof it may be assumed that the direction to make pre learned counsel appearing on behalf of the present petition with liberty supporting documents for waiver of pre-deposit required to be made. 3. It is directed that in the event such application alongwith supporting documents is moved by the peti IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23071 Date of decision: VERSUS Bhupinder Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Priyanshu Kamra, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed 06.12.2025, whereby the learned Additional has suspended the sentence of furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the tune of Rs. of the Trial Court and also to deposit 10% of the within a period of 60 days from the date of the passing of the After arguing the matter at some length and on being confronted with the absence of any material placed before this Court to for opinion otherwise or on the basis whereof it may be assumed that the direction to make pre-deposit suffers from any judicial mis learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner present petition with liberty to move an appropriate application alongwith supporting documents for waiver of 10% of the compensation deposit required to be made. It is directed that in the event such application alongwith supporting documents is moved by the petitioner, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 23071-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.04.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ for the petitioner. present petition has been filed for quashing the impugned , whereby the learned Additional District & Sessions suspended the sentence of the petitioner subject to to the tune of Rs.40,000/- to the satisfaction 0% of the compensation amount from the date of the passing of the said order. uing the matter at some length and on being confronted with the absence of any material placed before this Court to form any opinion otherwise or on the basis whereof it may be assumed that the deposit suffers from any judicial mis-appreciation, petitioner seeks withdrawal of the to move an appropriate application alongwith 0% of the compensation amount i.e. It is directed that in the event such application alongwith tioner, the First Appellate Court SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.28 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 144 CRM-M-23071-2026 (O&M) shall consider the said application in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.2741 of 2023 decided on 04.09.2023 titled “Jamboo Bhandari Vs. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. and others”. 4. In view of the above, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 5. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 27.04.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.28 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document