IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.997 of 2025 ------ Dhiraj Juneja, aged about-42 years, S/o-Rajendra Kumar Juneja, R/o-Sariya, P.O. + P.S.-Sariya, District-Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mohit Kumar Dey, aged about-72 years, S/o Late Jairam Dey, R/o-7, Rajkumar Bose Lane, P.O.-Dharamtolla, P.S.-Muchipara, Dist.-Kolkata (West Bengal). .... .... .... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Ranjan, Advocate : Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 13/02/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.3235 of 2018 instituted under Section 420/406/467/468/471/34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner cut the fruit bearing trees from the land of the complainant and sold them without his consent. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-15 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons paid Rs.16,00,000/- to the complainant. It is next submitted that the dispute between the parties is basically a civil dispute. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the complainant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Complaint Case No.3235 of 2018 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the complainant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/