ARUN KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/7252/2025 · 2025-05-21
Ajit Kumar
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48313 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48313 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:86495 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7252 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Singh Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avanish Kumar Upadhyay,Raj Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioner who is working with the U.P. Cement Corporation since 17.05.1982 as Tally Checker had to be discontinued on account of U.P. Cement Corporation being liquidated on 08.12.1992 and submits that in view of the rehabilitation policy of the State Government in respect of employees of the U.P. Cement Corporation, petitioner was also entitled to the benefit.
3. He also claims that the controversy is no more res integra in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Sunil Kumar Verma and others v. State of U.P. and others (Civil Appeal No.9165-9172 of 2010 and yet the petitioner's claim has remained unconsidered. He submits that recently this Court in respect of identical persons has passed order in Writ A No.3860 of 2020 (Deen Dayal and 14 others v. State of U.P. and 3 others) and Writ A No.15363 of 2021 (Awdhesh Kumar Dubey v. State of U.P. and 3 others) vide order dated 19.09.2024 and all these petitioners have been accorded benefit.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that the petitioner may be directed to make a fresh application/representation before the competent authority namely, respondent no.1 to decide the claim of the petitioner if it is covered by the
judgment of the Supreme Court and the recent order of this Court in the case of Deen Dayal (supra).
3. Learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection to the above prayer.
4. In view of the above, this petition stands
disposed of with direction to the petitioner to make a fresh representation regarding his claim before competent respondent authority within a period of four weeks, the same shall be looked into and considered and also disposed of as expeditiously as possible preferably within a further period of two months by means of reasoned and speaking order.
Order Date :- 22.5.2025 Deepika Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad