Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48305 (CHH)

PURSHOTTAM CHANDRAKER v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9656/2025 · 2025-12-12

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60733 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9656 of 2025 Purshottam Chandraker S/o Shri Chenna Chandraker Aged About 43 Years Posted As Assistant Project Co-Ordinator (Deputation) (Post Head Master Lb) R/o House No. 150, Indra Gandhi Ward, Bijapur, District - Bijapur, Chhattisgarh . ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, First Floor, Block - C, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Commissioner Division - Bastar, Place - Jagdalpur, District - Bastar, Chhattisgarh 4. Joint Director Division - Bastar, Department Of School Education, District - Bastar Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5. District Education Officer Bijapur, District - Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 6. Block Development Officer Bijapur, District - Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 7. Collector Bijapur District Bijapur Chhattisgarh 8. Director Samagra Shiksha, Board Office - Composite Building, 2nd Floor, Pension Bada, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 9. M.V. Rao Posted As Lecturer (Deputed As Assistant Project Co-Ordinator At Office Of Samagra Siksha Middle Level - Bijapur), Posted At Government Girls High Portacabin Naimed, District Bijapur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. A. Sandhya Rao, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sunil Verma and Petitioner in person through Video Call For Resp./State : Ms. Pragya Pandey, Dy. G.A. with Mr. Sandeep JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.12.13 15:32:36 +0530 2 Chopde, Assistant Director (Legal Cell), O/o DEO, Bilaspur AWARD (Passed on 13.12.2025) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashment of impugned order. 2. Today, both the parties filed compromise application stating that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Hence both the parties compromised the dispute amicably and as such nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. 3. The contesting parties to this petition have amicably settled/compromised the dispute. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/ settlement, proposed by the parties. 4. A copy of this docket/compromise arrived at by the parties be made part of this record. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Praveen Das) Judge - Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Jyoti