[2025:RJ-JP:51343] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19698/2025 Harbhajan Singh S/o Late Shri Poonam Singh, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Street No.1, Ambedkar Colony Fatehpuria (Ii), District Beawar. (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Govt. Secretariat Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer, Range Ajmer.(Raj.) 4. Superintendent Of Police, Ajmer.(Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: i) By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof and thereby direct the respondents to grant annual grade increment to the petitioner from the date of its entitlement i.e. from 2014 to 2017. ii) That by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the arrears along with other consequential benefits. [2025:RJ-JP:51343] (2 of 3) [CW-19698/2025] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 05.05.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8780/2025 titled as Rahul Dagur Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of at this stage. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days on basis of grounds available to him and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Rahul Dagur (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. [2025:RJ-JP:51343] (3 of 3) [CW-19698/2025] 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /155