APHC010444982014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36467/2014 Between: 1. M/S EAST WEST PHARMA,, ADMINISTRATION OFFICE: NO.10, 2ND CROSS, MARAVANERI, SALEM - 636007, TAMEA/EIKCLU. REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE- COMPANY AFFAIRS SHRI A.VENKATASUBBU S/O LATE ALAGARSAMY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, Golden Jubilee Hospital, Visakhapatnam Port Trust, (Central Government Undertaking), Salagramapuram, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh - 530024. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondent rejecting the Tender of the petitioner without any valid reason and not considering petitioners representation dated 31-10-2014 as illegal, arbitrary & unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent to forthwith consider the petitioners representation dated 31-10-2014 and include the petitioner in the suppliers list or call for a fresh e-tender IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 45648 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may 2 be pleased to direct the respondent herein to forthwith consider petitioners representation dated 31-10-2014 in accordance with law pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 99933 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M/S LEGOAL LAW SERVICES Counsel for the Respondent: 1. P SRI RAM 2. VIRUPAKSHA DATTATREYA GOUDA (SC FOR VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Since the tender relates to the procurement of drugs and medicines for the respondent’s hospital for the year 2014-2015, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 17th September, 2025 cbn 4 207 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.36467 of 2014 17th September, 2025 cbn