IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.24 of 2025 in CWP No.13929 of 2024 Decided on: 24.02.2025 Kehar Singh … Petitioner Versus J.C. Sharma and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. Mehar Chand Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the filing of the contempt petition now the petitioner has been reengaged though after two months. 3. In the light of the said development, no order is required to be passed in the contempt proceedings, the same are closed, however, with the observation that the factum of the reengagement of the petitioner after lapse of two months shall be taken into consideration by the Court at the time of the decision of the writ petition. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge February 24, 2025 (Vinod) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?