Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48298 (RAJ)

SUHAIL KHAN @ GOLU S/O FIROZ KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13739/2025 · 2025-11-13

Chandra Prakash Shrimali

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45797] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13739/2025 Suhail Khan @ Golu S/o Firoz Khan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Talav Gaonv, Krishna Vihar Colony, Opposite Ramprasad Ki Kirana Ki Dukan, Anantpura, District Kota City (At Present Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kaleem Ahamed Khan, Adv. Mr. Shamsuddin Ansari, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 13/11/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.419/2025 registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur City (East), District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 3, 3(1), 3(2) & 25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since 03.06.2025 and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:45797] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13739/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, perused the material available on record and the fact that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed; the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since 03.06.2025 but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Suhail Khan @ Golu S/o Firoz Khan is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. Considering the criminal antecedent(s) of the accused- petitioner, it is directed that if he is found to be involved in offence of similar nature in future, then the prosecution shall be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail granted to the accused-petitioner by this Court. The accused is also directed to mark his presence on 1st & 15th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. 7. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its compliance. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /121