KULDEEP CHAND AND ANR v. PUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD
CWP/10961/2024 · 2025-05-28
Deepinder Singh Nalwa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48291 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48291 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-10961 of 2024 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 246/3 CWP-10961 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:28.05.2025 Kuldeep Chand and another
....Petitioners Versus Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited (PUNSUP) .....Respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA **** Present: Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Prabhsher Singh Walia, Advocate, for the respondent. **** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA
, J. (Oral)
1. In the present writ petition, the petitioners are praying for quashing of orders dated 21.03.2024 (Annexure P-3) and 30.04.2024 (Annexure P-4) whereby, a fact finding enquiry for ascertaining the role of the petitioner has been ordered.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition is duly covered by the judgment passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case titled as Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Field Employees Union versus Union of India and others
, CWP No.27725 of 2013 and other connected petitions, decided
DINESH 2025.05.31 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-10961 of 2024 (O&M) 2 on 14.05.2025. However, he submits that a perusal of the aforesaid order would reflect that the liberty has been granted to the petitioners therein, to submit the representation, which will be considered by the concerned authority in terms of the order passed by the Court. He further submits that the present petition may be treated as a representation and the respondent be
directed to consider the same in light of the order passed in CWP No.27725 of 2013 and other connected petitions, decided on 14.05.2025.
3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in CWP-27725 of 2013 and other connected petitions, decided on 14.05.2025.
4. The respondent is directed to treat the present writ petition as a representation and take a decision in terms of the judgment passed by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP-27725 of 2013 and other connected petitions, decided on 14.05.2025
5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
(DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA)
JUDGE May 28, 2025
dinesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH 2025.05.31 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document