Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72831
Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6871 of 2016 Petitioner :- Nathuni And 2 Others Respondent :- Lilawati And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Birendra Singh,Chandra Bhushan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Baijant Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. This is plaintiffs' petition. In the suit instituted by the plaintiff, an application under Order VI, Rule 17 C.P.C. was filed by the plaintiff for amending the plaint, which was rejected by the trial Court against which civil revision was preferred, which has also been dismissed by the revisional Court.
2. List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of petitioner to press the writ petition. Sri Baijant Kumar Mishra, Advocate is present for defendants-respondents.
3. I have heard the counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
4. No case for interference is made out.
5. Writ petition is misconceived and stands dismissed. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Kushal Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad