IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4917 OF 2025 Between: Saginala Budde Saheb, S/o. Kullappa, Aged about 34 R/o.D.No.4-3-213, Bethel Church, Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District 516 390. years. ...Petitioner/Accused No.5 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...Respondent/Complainant 2. Peddamalli Lavanya, W/o.Madhusudhan Reddy, Aged about 35 years, R/o.Dinesh Nursing Home, Doctors Quarters, Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District. ...Respondent / Defacto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, under section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to Quash the proceedings in the Crime No.Proceedings in 209 of 2025 on the file of Pulivendula (UG) Police Station, YSR Kadapa District. LA. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, under section 482 of Cr.P.C, that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all and further proceedings in Crime No. 209 of 2025 on the file of it Pulivendula (UG) Police Station, YSR Kadapa District, including Arrest of the Petjtioner/A-5. praying # This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Hafinadh Nidamanuri, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: A \ APHC010231032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) • I sfei [3457] MONDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4917/2025 Between: Saginala Budde Saheb ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.HARINADH NIDAMANURI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: The petitioner is arrayed as accused No.5 in Crime No.209 of 2025, on the file of the Pulivendula UG Police Station, YSR Kadapa district, for alleged offences under Section 420 read with 34 of IPO. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner filed this petition seeking the quashing of the FIR, he has, however, restricted the relief to the i HI 2 \ A extent of directing the Investigating Officer to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, and the guidelines prescribed by the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar\ The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor stated that he has no 4. objection to give such a direction. 5. The criminal petition is disposed of by directing the Station House Officer, Pulivendula UG Police Station, YSR Kadapa district, to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNSS”) in so far as the petitioner is concerned. 6. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. T (2014) 8 see 273 SD/- M SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Station House Officer, Pulivendula (UG) Police Station, YSR Kadapa District. 2. One CC to Sri. Harinadh Nidamanuri, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies PR PRK high court DATED;05/05/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.4917 of 2025 DISPOSING THE CRLP