APHC010606522008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 96/2008 Between: 1. MYLAPALLI ADINARAYANA, S/O. GURUVULU EMPLOYEE S.E. RAILWAY R/O. BOGGULA DIBBA, CANTONMENT, VIZIANAGARAM ...APPELLANT AND 1. SMT MYLAPALLI VANI SRIVANI, W/o. Adinarayana Housewife R/o. Bhanojinagar, Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against ordersset aside the Judgment and decree dated 19.7.2000 in O.P.No.8 of 2003 on the file of the Judge, Family Court at Visakhapatnam by allowing the FCA. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(FCAMP 361 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 16 days in filing the FCA. IA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 86 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the decree and judgement dated 19.07.2007 in OP No.8 of 2003 [OP No.266 of 2002 Papur] on the file of Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2012(FCAMP 535 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 vacate the interim suspension Order granted by this Hon'ble Court in F.C.A. M.P. No. 86/2008 in F.C.A. No. 96/2008 dated 31.03.2008. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P GOPALA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. M SRINIVASA RAO 2. N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.96 of 2008 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) During the course of hearing of this appeal today, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that he has no instructions to prosecute this appeal further and hence, requested to close this appeal. 2. The statement of the learned counsel for the appellant is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date:24.09.2025 SCS 4 167 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.96 of 2008 Dt.24.09.2025 SCS