914-WP-979-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 979 OF 2024 Santosh Laxmanrao Chaudhari VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector And Others *** • Mr. V. A. Bagadiya, Advocate for the Petitioner • Mr. S. B. Jadhav, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3/State • Mr. Swapnil Patnunkar i/by J. P. Legal Asso, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4 *** CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2025 PER COURT : 1. After hearing learned Counsels for both sides and when this Court has shown disinclination to cause interference in the impugned order, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the Petition with liberty to file fresh application under Order XXVI, Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure at appropriate stage of the suit. 2. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Umesh PAGE 1 OF 2 2025:BHC-AUG:5384 914-WP-979-2024.odt 3. It is clarified that only because liberty is granted by this Court, any application so filed need not be allowed. Trial Court to decide such application on its own merit. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Umesh PAGE 2 OF 2