MADALA VENKATA SIVA KOTESWARA RAO v. S SATYANARAYANA IAS
CC/3111/2025 · 2025-12-02
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48272 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48272 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010564722025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3111 OF 2025 Between:
1. MADALA VENKATA SIVA KOTESWARA RAO, S/o. Sathyannarayana, aged 55 years, R/o. 29-1205/2, Opp- RTC Quarters, Kothapeta, Vinukonda Mandal, Palnadu District (Before Guntur District). ...Petitioner AND
1. S SATYANARAYANA IAS, presently working as Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, BC Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
2. Sri Peeyush Kumar IAS, presently working as Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District
3. Sri A Mallikarjuna IAS, Director, Backward Classes Welfare Department, 2nd Floor, Vishal residency. Near VR Siddhartha College Kanuru, Tadigadapa, Vijayawada, NTR District.
...Respondents
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for their wilful
SRK, J CC No.3111 of 2025
2 disobedience of the order of this Honble Court dated 14.08.2025 passed in W.P. No. 21287 of 2023.
Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMESH BABU TALLURI
Counsel for the Respondents: U KANAKA RAJU Counsel for the Respondents:
SRK, J CC No.3111 of 2025
3 The Court made the following ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders of this Court dated 14.08.2025 passed in Writ Petition No.21287 of 2023.
2. Today, when the matter came up for admission, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court, no further orders are necessary to be passed in this Contempt Case.
3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Contempt Case shall stand closed.
________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:03.12.2025 Nsr
SRK, J CC No.3111 of 2025
4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Contempt Case No.3111 of 2025
Date:03.12.2025
Nsr