RAVI SINGH AND OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA TH MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
LPA/227/2024 · 2025-03-12
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi, Sanjeev Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4827 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4827 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 29
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
LPA No. 227/2024 In SWP No. 2/2019 c/w LPA No. 201/2024
Ravi Singh and Ors. …. Appellant(s)
Through:- Ms. S. Kour, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Manpreet Kour, Advocate. Mr. Nonu S. Khera, Advocate.
V/s
UOI and Ors. …..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 12.03.2025 LPA No. 227/2024
Ms. S. Kour, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants, submits that the case in hand is fully covered by the judgment of this Court dated 25.11.2024 passed in LPA No. 193/2024 along with other clubbed matters.
Mr. Vishal Sharma, learned DSGI appearing for the respondents, could not point out any distinguishing features in the case at hand.
In view of the aforesaid facts, this appeal is also decided in terms of
judgment (supra). The judgment passed by the learned Single Judge is set aside.
Consequently, writ petition filed by the appellants is allowed and termination orders whereof are quashed.
The appellants shall be put back in service forthwith along with all consequential benefits.
LPA No. 201/2024
Ms. S. Kour, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants, submits that the case in hand is fully covered by the judgment of this Court dated 25.11.2024 passed in LPA No. 193/2024 along with other clubbed matters.
Mr. Vishal Sharma, learned DSGI appearing for the respondents, could not point out any distinguishing features in the case at hand.
In view of the aforesaid facts, this appeal is also decided in terms of
judgment (supra). The judgment passed by the learned Single Judge is set aside.
Consequently, writ petition filed by the appellants is allowed and termination orders whereof are quashed.
The appellants shall be put back in service forthwith along with all consequential benefits.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Judge
Jammu:
12.03.2025 Vishal Sharma