GRANDHI KRISHNA MURTHY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/25702/2025 · 2025-09-21
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48264 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48264 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010497702025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25702/2025 Between:
1. GRANDHI KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O.LATE VENKATRAJU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.8-14-4, BALAJI NAGAR, BEHIND SP BUNGLOW, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, VIZIANAGARAM.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RURAL POLICE STATION, VIZIANAGARAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT.
4. VIZAG INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, VESTAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICES PRIVATE LTD., REPRESENTED BY J.V.N.K. SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.VENKATA PULLARAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, KORUKONDA ROAD, KORUKONDA, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in harassing the petitioner and threatening to open a Rowdy Sheet against the
2
Petitioner by involving in a civil dispute between the Petitioner and the 4th Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and contrary to Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the 3rd Respondent not to compel the Petitioner to appear before him without there being any case is registered against him and not to take any coercive action against the petitioner, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent not to compel the Petitioner to appear before him without there being any case is registered against him and not to take any coercive action against the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SARIPALLI SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25702 of 2025
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to Issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in harassing the petitioner and threatening to open a Rowdy Sheet against the Petitioner by involving in a civil dispute between the Petitioner and the 4th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and contrary to Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the 3rd Respondent not to compel the Petitioner to appear before him without there being any case is registered against him and not to take any coercive action against the petitioner and pass….”
2. Heard Sri Saripalli Subrahmanyam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that Police are harassing the petitioner to appear before the Police Station to open the Rowdy Sheet.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions would submit that on the applications made by the petitioner under public grievance redressal system. For enquiry, police called the petitioner to the Police Station. But petitioner did not appear before the police. He would further submit that Police are not intend to open any Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner.
4
5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.09.2025. SNI
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.25702 of 2025
Dated.22.09.2025
SNI
620