CHANNABASAVESHWAR CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMIT v. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
WP/102295/2025 · 2025-10-16
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48256 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48256 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13996 WP No. 102295 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 102295 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN:
CHANNABASAVESHWAR CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMIT, RAJENDRA COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, 5/6, KHADEBAZAR, BELAGAVI – 590 001, R/BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SHRI. SHIVALING S/O. RAYAPPA SANGOLI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVRAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF MUNCIPAL ADMINISTRATION, VIDHANSOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001, R/BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF CITY OF BELAGAVI, CTS NO. 4821/27A, RS NO. 1005, SUBHASH NAGAR, BELAGAVI – 590 016, R/BY IS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND RECOVERY OFFICER, KARNATAKA STATE SOUHARDA FEDERAL CO - OPERATIVE LTD., 'SOUHARD SAHAKARI SOUDHA' NO.68, 1ST FLOOR, BETWEEN 17TH AND 18TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU – 560 055. 4. SHRI. NARASAYA S/O. KAIYON GUNTAGANI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: NIL, R/O: BUDA COLONY, PLOT NO.56, LAKSHMI NAGAR, OPP. SANAMEER SCHOOL, ANAGOL, BELAGAVI – 590 006. Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13996 WP No. 102295 of 2025
5. SMT. JHUTA S. DEVID, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: NIL, R/O: C/O. CIVIL ADMINISTRATION OFFICER, 405 AIR FORCE STATION, SAMBRA, BELAGAVI – 591 124. 6. INTOORI CHINNAYYA GIDONI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: NIL, R/O: H.NO. 773, SARSWATI NAGAR, GANESHPUR, BELAGAVI – 591 108. 7. ELLIJAMMA K.G., AGE: MAJOR, OCC: NIL, R/O: H.NO. 56, BUDA COLONY, ANAGOL, BELAGAVI - 590 006. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH CHIGARI, AGA FOR R1 AND R3;
V/O DATED: 14.10.2025 NOTICE TO R4 TO R7 IS DISPENSED WITH;
SRI. CHETAN MUNOOLI, ADVOCATE FOR R2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO.2 TO ENTER THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE PROPERTY TAX REGISTER IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION PROPERTY BEARING PLOT NO.56, MEASURING 600 SQ.
FEET CARVED OUT OF RS NO/TMC NO.38/D SITUATED AT ANAGOL, BELAGAVI PURSUANT TO THE TRANSFER CERTIFICATE DATED 01/09/2023 AND REGISTERED ON 01/12/2023 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN EP NO.KA.RA.SOU.SAN.SA.NI/SA.SA.NI/VA.AA/1157/2021-22 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13996 WP No. 102295 of 2025
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer:
A. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent no.2 to enter the name of the Petitioner in the property tax register in respect of the Petition Property bearing Plot No.56, measuring 600 Sq. Feet carved out of RS No/TMC No.38/D situated at Anagol, Belagavi pursuant to the Transfer Certificate dated 01/09/2023 and registered on 01/12/2023 issued by Respondent no.3 in favour of the Petitioner in EP No.Ka.Ra. Sou. San. Sa.Ni/ Sa.Sa.Ni/ Va.Aa/ 1157/ 2021-22 vide Annexure-A.
B. Pass any such other order(s) as this Hon’ble Court as deemed to fit to meet the ends of justice and equity. 2. The learned counsel Sri.Chetan Munnoli submits that no application even is submitted in redressal of the grievance of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application was sought to be submitted but was not taken by the respondents. 3. In that light, I deem it appropriate to dispose the petition with a direction to the petitioner to submit an application in the appropriate format to the respondent
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13996 WP No. 102295 of 2025
within 15 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order. 4. In the event such an application is preferred, it shall merit consideration in accordance with law and appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law within 4 weeks from the date of submission of the representation. Ordered accordingly.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
KGK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63