Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48252 (AP)

Reddypalli Mahalakshmi @ Anke Mahalakshmi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/15819/2021 · 2025-09-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010272572021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15819/2021 Between: 1. REDDYPALLI MAHALAKSHMI @ ANKE MAHALAKSHMI, W/O.REDDYPALLI BRAHMAIAH, D/O.THIPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O.RACHEPALLI VILLAGE, URAVAKONDA MANDAL, KOWKUNTLA POST, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.18-795-31, 60FEET ROAD, NEAR CHURCH, GUNTAKAL TOWN, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANANTHAPURAMU. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, URUKONDA POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K BHIMANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ or order or direction one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the respondents police in not taking steps for her release from the clutches of her parents since long time to lead life with life and liberty as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 19, 21 and 21 (a) of the Constitution of India unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to take steps for release of the petitioner from her parents to lead life with liberty and be pleased to pass.” 2 2. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last occasion. Today also, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.15819 of 2021 Dt.23.09.2025 Asr