Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48245 (AP)

G KANNABABU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/13290/2024 · 2025-09-23

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010266562024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 13290/2024 Between: 1. G KANNABABU, S/O.G.SANYASI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, WORKING AS OFFICE SUBORDINATE AT ANDHRA PRADESH RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL (BOYS) BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE (HR IV-FR AND LR) VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE ANDHRA PRADESH RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VIJAYAWADA. 4. ANDHRA PRADESH RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL BOYS, BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, or order or direction more 2 particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 and 2 in not taking steps for enhancement of petitioners age of superannuation from 60 to 62 years on the proposals dated 12.10.2022 sent by the 3rd respondent society and as well the representation dt. 12.02.2024 is as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to G.O. Ms. No. 15 dated 31-01-2022 and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service as office subordinate in the 4th respondent school till he attains the age of superannuation of 62 years as per G.O. Ms. No. 15 dated 31-01- 2022 duly considering the proposals sent by the 3rd respondent dated 12.10.2022 and well as representation dt. 12.02.2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service as office subordinate in the 4th respondent School till he attains the age of superannuation of 62 years pursuant to G.O. Ms. No. 15 dated 31-01-2022 duly corisidering the proposals sent by the 3rd respondent dated 12.10.2022 and as well the representation dt. 12.02.2024 pending writ petition in this Hon’ble Court and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Vacate the Interim Order dated.28.06.202 4 passed in I.A No. 1 of 2024 in W.P. No. 13290 of 2024 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 28-06-2024 passed in IA No. 1 of 2024 of Wp.No. 13290 of 2024 andpass Counsel for the Petitioner: 3 1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NOOKA JAGANNADHAM 2. GP FOR SERVICES III 3. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.13290 of 2024 ORDER : Learned counsel for the Petitioner has filed a letter dated 23.09.2025 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission as sought for is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 24.09.2025 KLP